<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intent Content&#187; American politics and its ups and downs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intentcontent.com/category/news/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intentcontent.com</link>
	<description>All Content is Intent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obama Family Drops Value of White House by More Than $15 Million</title>
		<link>http://intentcontent.com/news/obama-family-drops-value-of-white-house-by-more-than-15-million/</link>
		<comments>http://intentcontent.com/news/obama-family-drops-value-of-white-house-by-more-than-15-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jchunter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intentcontent.com/?p=389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Zillow shamelessly plays the race card in promoting their site. The title of the actual article I am referencing is, &#34;<a href="http://www.cnbc.com//id/34956652" target="_blank">Value of White House Drops by More Than $15 Million</a>&#34;, on cnbc.com. But, they might as well had placed the title that was used on intentcontent.com. Lets be straight up, why introduce such an article when President Obama, a multiracial man is occupying the White House, while the housing crisis happened while, former President George W. Bush was in the White House? Accordingly, while the value of the White House dropped by a mere 5% in Obama's first year, it took a 7% plunge in Bush's last year of occupancy.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://intentcontent.com/news/obama-family-drops-value-of-white-house-by-more-than-15-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fact Checking Sarah Palin Going Rogue</title>
		<link>http://intentcontent.com/news/fact-checking-sarah-palin-going-rogue/</link>
		<comments>http://intentcontent.com/news/fact-checking-sarah-palin-going-rogue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jchunter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intentcontent.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Has the AP gone mad? No, they did not spend much time or resources fact checking <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Going-Rogue-LP-American-Life/dp/0061979554/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#38;s=books&#38;qid=1258932410&#38;sr=8-1" target="_blank">Sarah Palin's book, Going Rouge</a>, but they are wasting Americans time with their ill fascination and humiliation of the new politician on the scene. I neither dislike, nor like Sarah Palin, but I do feel bad for her, and at the same time respect her sudden rise in the Republican forefront. One has to consider, why the AP did not mention that she got stuck with bills from the presidential election that McCain's camp promised to pay for. FACT!</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://intentcontent.com/news/fact-checking-sarah-palin-going-rogue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
